Poor People? NIMBY!
Mon Nov 14, 2005 at 02:51:35 PM PDT
Just when you thought that we had framed the debate on poverty in America . . . when millions who previously hadn't acknowledged the extent of the problem are forced to see the Katrina Aftermath . . . when House Dems stop HUGE cuts to Food Stamps . . . the powers that be find a brand new way oppress, as noted in today's Worcester, MA
Telegram and Gazette
A Washington, D.C., mental health legal advocacy group says the recommendations of the Mayor's Social Service Task Force would violate federal law if they were adopted.
Below the fold for how the Worcester Government treats homeless like toxic waste . . .
Today Worcester residents found out the Worcester Social Services Task Force is looking to bend regulations concerning the citing of facilities for indigent mentally ill residents.
I am the first to admit that providing support for mentally ill homeless persons is not an easy thing to do, either in terms of professional dedication, community support, or economics. I applaud those whom have choosen to undertake this very important endevor for the benefit of all.
However, I assume that a homelessness task force is in the same category that I outlined above, not an establishment tool to form, as I would call them, "crazy-homeless ghettos."
From the
T&G article (requires subscription):
The Bazelon analysis, dated Oct. 25, said the task force's recommendations would make many of the voluntary practices of the nonprofits mandatory in accordance with state Executive Office of Health and Human Services regulations. "The notification and `public process' called for in the report may actually undermine Worcester officials' legal obligation to give people with disabilities an equal opportunity to live where they choose." That is because public hearings often provide forums for neighbors' anger and fears, exposing prospective group home residents to "invasive public scrutiny (which) heavily influences the local officials charged with granting or denying permits," the analysis states.
Information such as that released in the
Bazelon report is discouraging, but I can't decide in what way it is
truly discouraging.
There is the possibility that MSM simply picks up on stories like this one that have the implication, that I find real from my experience as an organizer, of conflict and underhanded attempts to placate the powerful while maintaining an egalitiarian "task force" facade. Then there is the above mentioned possibility that populations really do have the NIMBY reflex for the less fortunate, that they treat their fellow citizens in the same way we treat toxic waste.
I hope its the MSM's fault. Can we please just continue to blame the media?